ICANN

[http://www.icann.org/]

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICANN]

ICANN, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, is the US non-profit body responsible for the global coordination of IP address space allocation, protocol parameter assignment, domain name system management and root server system management. Established in California in 1998, ICANN initally focused on the United States but ultimately looked outward with the rapid expansion of internet connections on the worldwide web. Since control over domain names wields substantial economic and commerical powers, ICANN is subject to growing international pressure to hand over control of domain name allocation to the UN. However, to date, US officials have refused to allow oversight to be handed over.

ICANN‘s accountability lies in its consistency with its Bylaws, as well as the values associated with its Bylaws. ICANN‘s transparency and accountability mechanisms are such that ICANN has created procedures for the independent review of ICANN actions, as well as the establishment of Ombudsmen to resolve disputes where possible.

Articles

Domain Name Registrars

There are thousands of domain name registrars, amongst which:

Structure

At present, ICANN is formally organized as a non-profit corporation “for charitable and public purposes” under the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law. It is managed by a Board of Directors, which is composed by six representatives of the Supporting Organizations, sub-groups that deal with specific sections of the policies under ICANN‘s purview; eight independent representatives of the general public interest, selected through a Nominating Committee in which all the constituencies of ICANN are represented; and the President and CEO, appointed by the rest of the Board.

The Supporting Organizations are currently three: the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) deals with policy making on generic top-level domains (gTLDs); the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) deals with policy making on country-code top-level domains (ccTLDs); the Address Supporting Organization (ASO) deals with policy making on IP addresses.

procedures

ICANN holds periodic public meetings rotated between continents for the expressed purpose of encouraging global participation in its processes. Critics argue that the locations of these meetings are often in countries with lower Internet usage and far away from locations that the majority of the Internet-using public can afford to reach, thus making public input or participation from traditional Internet users less likely. Supporters reply that ICANN has a worldwide remit and a key part of its mission is to build Internet use where it is weak.

ICANN was set up in California due to the presence of Jon Postel, who was a founder of ICANN and was set to be its first CTO prior to his unexpected death. ICANN remains in the same building where he worked, which is home to an office of the Information Sciences Institute at the University of Southern California.

Resolutions of the ICANN Board, preliminary reports and minutes of the meetings are published for the public to view on the ICANN website. However there are criticisms from ICANN constituencies like Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC) and At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) that there is not enough public disclosure and that too many discussions take place out of sight of the public.

Notable events in ICANN history

  • On March 14, 2002, in a public meeting in Accra, in Ghana, ICANN decided to reduce direct public (”at large”) participation.
  • On February 28, 2006, ICANN‘s board approved a settlement with VeriSign in the lawsuit resulting from SiteFinder that involved allowing VeriSign (the registry) to raise its registration fees by up to 7% a year.[5] This was criticised by some people in the US House of Representatives’ Small Business committee.

On May 10, 2006 ICANN failed to approve a plan for a new “.xxx” suffix that would have been designated for websites with pornographic content.

  • On July 26, 2006, the United States Government renewed the contract with ICANN for performance of the IANA function for an additional one to five years. The context of ICANN‘s relationship with the US Government was clarified on September 29, 2006 when ICANN signed a new Memorandum of Understanding with the United States Department of Commerce (DOC).
  • In February 2007, ICANN began the steps to remove accreditation of one of their registrars, RegisterFly, amid charges and lawsuits involving fraud, and criticism of ICANN‘s handling of the situation. ICANN has also been the subject of criticism, due to their handling of RegisterFly, and the harm caused to thousands of clients due to what was called their “laissez faire attitude toward customer allegations of fraud”.

Arguments about ICANN

  • The neutrality of this section is disputed.
  • The quality of this article or section may be compromised by weasel words.
  • You can help Wikipedia by removing weasel words.
Governance issues
  • ICANN was charged with “Operating in a bottom up, consensus driven, democratic manner” by the US Department of Commerce in the Memorandum of Understanding that set up the relationship between ICANN and the US Government. However, the attempts that ICANN made to set up an organizational structure that would allow wide input from the global Internet community did not work well; the At-Large constituency and direct election of board members by the global Internet community were soon abandoned.
  • Proponents of an unrestricted namespace argue that ICANN was never given the right to decide policy (ie: choose new TLDs or shut out other who refuse to pay their USD 50,000 fee), but was to be a technical caretaker. They claim that ICANN should not be allowed to impose business rules on market participants - all TLDs should be added on a first-come-first-served basis and the market should be the arbiter of who succeeds and who doesn’t.
  • In addition to that, a member of the European Parliament, William Newton-Dunn, has recently been addressing questions to the European Commission which asks whether ICANN is engaging in restraint of European free trade laws by imposing restrictions on who can operate a TLD and sell domain names. The restrictions are considered insurmountable by many small business owners and individuals, such as the non-refundable $50,000 application fee.

External links

  • ICANN website

Memorandum of Understanding Between the Department of Commerce and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

  • ICANNWatch

Site advocating the return of public representation in ICANN VeriSign Domain Report - Quarterly analysis of global domain name market DailyChanges.com — a free ICANN Registrar Statistics website Retrieved from “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICANN

 
icann.txt · Last modified: 2008/01/18 15:15 by riicha
 
Recent changes RSS feed Creative Commons License Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki